AI Regulatory Landscape
Emerging regulations demand what Reality Fidelity provides: verifiable AI governance with complete audit trails.
The Regulatory Reality
Governments worldwide are implementing AI regulations that require organizations to demonstrate their AI systems operate with appropriate safeguards. These regulations share common themes:
- Risk-based classification of AI systems
- Requirements for human oversight
- Transparency and explainability mandates
- Documentation and audit trail requirements
- Quality management system obligations
EU AI Act
Europe In Force 2024 High-Risk AIThe world's first comprehensive AI regulation. Classifies AI systems by risk level and imposes strict requirements on high-risk applications in healthcare, finance, employment, and critical infrastructure.
Key Requirements:
- Risk management systems throughout AI lifecycle
- Data governance and quality requirements
- Technical documentation and logging
- Transparency to users
- Human oversight capabilities
- Accuracy, robustness, and cybersecurity
How Reality Fidelity Helps:
Completeness gates ensure AI systems cannot emit outputs without verified required state, satisfying risk management and data quality requirements. Provenance tracking creates the technical documentation and logging required for compliance.
FDA AI/ML Guidance
United States Healthcare SaMDFDA guidance for Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) incorporating AI/ML. Focuses on ensuring AI-based medical devices are safe and effective throughout their lifecycle.
Key Requirements:
- Good Machine Learning Practice (GMLP)
- Algorithm change protocol documentation
- Real-world performance monitoring
- Predetermined change control plans
- Clinical validation requirements
How Reality Fidelity Helps:
Required state registries ensure diagnostic AI systems verify patient context and calibration before emitting classifications. Audit trails document every decision point for FDA review.
NIST AI Risk Management Framework
United States Framework VoluntaryVoluntary framework providing guidance for managing AI risks. Structured around four core functions: Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage.
Core Functions:
- Govern — Establish AI risk management culture and accountability
- Map — Identify and categorize AI risks
- Measure — Analyze and assess AI risks
- Manage — Prioritize and act on AI risks
How Reality Fidelity Helps:
Reality Fidelity architecture directly implements the "Measure" and "Manage" functions by quantifying completeness of required state and preventing outputs when risks are unacceptable.
SEC AI Guidance
United States Finance ProposedProposed SEC rules addressing AI use by investment advisers and broker-dealers, focusing on conflicts of interest and investor protection.
Key Concerns:
- Predictive data analytics in investment advice
- Conflicts of interest from AI optimization
- Explainability of AI-driven recommendations
- Fairness in algorithmic trading
Sector-Specific Regulations
- Healthcare — HIPAA, FDA 21 CFR Part 11, state medical AI laws
- Finance — Fair lending laws, anti-discrimination requirements, fiduciary duties
- Insurance — State insurance AI regulations, actuarial standards
- Employment — EEOC AI guidance, state automated decision laws
- Child Safety — COPPA, state child protection laws, platform obligations
Compliance Timeline
- 2024 — EU AI Act enters into force; FDA continues SaMD guidance development
- 2025 — EU AI Act prohibited practices take effect; state AI laws proliferate
- 2026 — EU AI Act high-risk system requirements fully applicable
- Ongoing — NIST framework adoption expands; sector-specific rules evolve